On 07/12/15 11:18, Rowan Collins wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote on 07/12/2015 09:42:
>> Providing PHP7 clean alternatives with usable upgrade paths is the
>> only way that PHP5.2/3 can be deprecated fully, so any debate on an
>> arbitrary EOL for 5.6 is simple pie in the sky? When will Python2
>> disappear ... now unlikely it ever will? Is PHP5.2 any different? 
> 
> People said the same about PHP 4, but eventually it did disappear, and I
> think 5.2 is well down the same road (counting 5.3 as being 6.0 in all
> but name).

Things are certainly heading in the right direction, but 5.2/3 is still
only dropped bellow 50% in the last month, while PHP4 was well down when
the actual EOL was proposed. 80% of people were using PHP5.2 in 2010
against 20% on PHP4, and that swung to 90/10 in 2011 mainly because PHP4
sites could be switched to PHP5.2 ... switching 5.2/3 sites to PHP7 is
not so easy, but
http://w3techs.com/technologies/history_details/pl-php/5/y probably
shows the best picture, with people migrating to PHP5.4 as the next step
...

-- 
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to