Hey：
> On Nov 30, 2015, at 22:48, Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Andreas Heigl wrote on 30/11/2015 12:23:
>>> Am 30.11.15 um 13:18 schrieb Peter Cowburn:
>>> class A {
>>>> const TEST = false;
>>>> public function test() {
>>>> var_dump(static::TEST);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> class B extends A {
>>>> const TEST = true;
>>>>
>>>> public function test() {
>>>> A::test();
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> $b = new B;
>>>> $b->test();
>> You are calling explicitly A::test().
>>
>> When you call parent::test() everything works as you'd expect it.
>>
>> Have a look at https://3v4l.org/RCrRd
>>
>> Apart from that you are calling an instance-method as a static method by
>> using A::test().
>
> This appears to be the crucial thing: if you declare the test() method as
> static in both classes, it returns false in all versions:
> https://3v4l.org/hJoor
>
> It's almost like A::test() is now interpreted as a static call, rather than a
> "scope resolution" of the instance method, but $this is still available, so
> it's not quite as simple as that: https://3v4l.org/qbT3j
>
dmitry has committed a fix, please have a look
Thanks
> Regards,
> --
> Rowan Collins
> [IMSoP]
>
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
