On Sep 11, 2015 12:14 AM, "Pierre Joye" <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 10, 2015 10:32 PM, "Sean DuBois" <s...@siobud.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:25:16PM +0100, Joe Watkins wrote: > > > Afternoon internals, > > > > > > Is there any concrete plan for deploying pecl extensions for PHP7 ? > > > > > > Anatol (or anyone), is there any way to get windows ext's built against > > > RC's while we're waiting for PECL/pickle/apples/whatever to be sorted ? > > > > > > Cheers > > > Joe > > > > Quite a few extensions are being developed via branches now. It sounds > > like this will be ok if pickle is being used, but should I be worried > > about causing people headaches before that is ready?
Fixing autocorrect :) > Branches are releases nightmares if they are all have the same versions, like all are 1.4.x but only one branch supports 7. I mean if an extension uses either 1.4 for 5.x and 1.5/2.x for 7 with same APIs. This is a long term pain from a developer and end user point of view. > I have asked that some time ago already and pointed out that we should really support semver and one branch per extension version, not per supported php version. > > > I really don't want to have a bunch of preprocessor use in the > > extensions I am working on. It makes them harder to maintain, and a lot > > harder for new contributors. > > It is not necessary required, you an email multiple files. You can use multiple files. Single branche also helps to ensure APIs compatibility across php versions (same codename being maintained). > > > > thanks > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
