On 24.07.2015, at 09:33, Adam Harvey <ahar...@php.net> wrote:
> 
> On 23 July 2015 at 11:47, Christoph Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote:
> <snip great explanation, thanks>
>> Therefore I tend to prefer a new ini setting (say, pcre.jitstack_limit).
>> That would mean, however, to add yet another ini setting, of which
>> there are already so many.
> 
> I'm not a big fan of that, although it's at least in the spirit of
> what configuration settings are meant to be used for.
> 
> What if we added the PCRE_ERROR_JIT_STACKLIMIT error constant to those
> exposed to userland so that it's more easily noticed via
> preg_last_error(), and adding a modifier that can be used to disable
> the JIT on a per-pattern basis (by setting PCRE_NO_START_OPTIMIZE,
> which admittedly disables other stuff too, but at least the regex will
> run)? At least then users could check the error when the regex fails
> and re-run the regex without the JIT if they chose to.

But this might mean that patterns which previously worked, because no JIT was 
used, suddenly fail in existing code with a new error constant. Which I guess 
is a BC break.



--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to