I, personally, don't have strong opinion. Both behaviors work for me. Bob, if you are going to change this, please show the patch first.
Thanks. Dmitry. On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > Hi again, > > > On 29 Jun 2015, at 18:02, Bob Weinand <bobw...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > Yes, it generally makes sense... > > Then I have other questions: > > > > - Why do we then still have a Warning? Either we have well-defined > behavior, or we throw an exception. Well-defined behavior *plus* a warning > is IMO non-sense. > > That’s weird, yeah. We don’t throw warnings for the math functions when > you give them odd inputs, e.g. sin(INF) is just NAN, no warning. > > I think removing it would make sense. > > > - Is it intentional for intdiv and % to throw an Exception instead of > Error or some more specific DivisionByZeroError or similar? (yes, I know, > Error is only very recent, but the question still needs to be asked). > > Hmm. Using Error might make some sense given it used to raise E_WARNING. I > think DivisionByZeroError sounds like a good idea. > > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > >
