On 22/05/15 01:19, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> > I'd like to add "void" to this list, so we have the option to introduce a >> > void return type in PHP 7.x. I've seen some disagreement as to whether this > I think this type makes no sense in PHP, but I don't object to having > note in the docs for people not to name their classes "void" (not that > there's any reason to do it anyway...). I strongly object to introducing > any changes in the code though - warnings, etc.
The whole problem here is that anything that is documented gives some legitimacy to the idea that it must be included during the PHP7 cycle. Since there is no consensus on the whole area it would perhaps block a more practical alternative if that surfaces in the next few years? Not that I can see anything that falls in that category either? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
