Hi! Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> Ahh, I see. I think it's the mistake in the RFC. [...] Then it is probably best to fix the RFC. :) > I'm not a big fan of throwing too many notices. They are usually not > very helpful an din this case it would be not easy to distinguish > between intentional and unintentional use. <snip> > $a > $b being false is an artifact of how ">" works in the engine - $a > > $b is essentially ($b < $a). Since in this case both $a > $b and $b > > $a, the result of ($b < $a) is false. That's what you get when you > compare non-well-ordered things... I get your point. I suggest to amend the documentation[1] to make it clear that comparing non-well-ordered values results in undefined behavior (it might be best to treat the return value 1 in this case as implementation specific). [1] <http://php.net/manual/en/language.operators.comparison.php> -- Christoph M. Becker -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
