On Tuesday, 31 March 2015, Zeev Suraski <z...@zend.com> wrote: > All, > > > > One thing that I think we should change is how we refer to the ‘weak’ type > hints. The word ‘weak’ has a negative ring to it, and considering this is > how the language behaves across the board it’s a pretty bad name for this > feature. > > > > Personally I think we should go for ‘dynamic’ when we document it, as this > is the common way to refer to this behavior (dynamic languages). We could > also consider going for ‘lax’ or ‘lenient’ as the opposite of ‘strict’, > although I think we can easily do without introducing a new word into the > vocabulary here. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Zeev >
Coercive? -- Regards, Terry Cullen Freelance Senior PHP Programmer/Web Developer -- Phone 1300-955-838 <+61-1300-955-838>Mobile 04-3836-8032 <+61-4-3836-8032> Email te...@terrycullen.com.auWeb http://www.terrycullen.com.au/G-Talk te...@terrycullen.com.au13 Jarrott St, ChelmerTerah Pty Ltd | ACN 135 365 552 <http://www.terrycullen.com.au/>[image: Terah Pty Ltd logo] <http://www.terrycullen.com.au/>
