> rather than having a single untyped parameter amongst typed ones

Yes, when experimenting with strict types, I'd rather move things in and
out of 'mixed' than remove the notation completely.  Like you said, 'mixed'
means, "I've reviewed this area and concluded it needs to be dynamic."

Also, maybe I missed this upthread, but are the docs still going to refer
to 'mixed'?

-- Sandy

Reply via email to