Hi Peter:

Sorry to reply late, because the GFW, I can’t access *.google.com at home.  
>  
>  
> On 16 March 2015 at 14:59, Xinchen Hui <larue...@php.net 
> (mailto:larue...@php.net)> wrote:
> > Hey:
> >  
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com 
> > (mailto:petercowb...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > On 16 March 2015 at 01:40, Wei Dai <zxcvda...@gmail.com 
> > > (mailto:zxcvda...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > >  
> > > > Hi internals,
> > > >  
> > > > The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
> > > > preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion:
> > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/preg_replace_callback_array
> > > >  
> > > > This proposes adding one function: `preg_replace_callback_array()` that
> > > > is the better way to Implement when there are multiple patterns need to
> > > > replace.
> > > >  
> > > > I would love to hear your feedback! :)
> > >  
> > > Could you add a paragraph or two explaining the reasons for choosing this
> > > particular proposal?
> > > Some examples of what I would like to read:
> > > - why we can't do preg_replace_callback($array_of_regexes,
> > > $array_of_callbacks, $subject)
> >  
> > array() also could be a valid callback.. (array("clasname", "methodname")).
> > > - why not preg_replace_callback($array_of_regex_to_callback_pairs,
> > > $subject)
> >  
> > there are also $limit, $count argument could be used.
> > > - why not pass the regex used to the callback, as per Laruence's earlier
> > > RFC
> >  
> > bc break..(change the callback's signature)
> > >  
> > > And give a few links to historical discussions in the same sort of area?
> > > E.g Laruence's RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/second_arg_to_preg_callback 
> > > and
> > > its discussion thread (http://php.markmail.org/thread/qwiyq5o2vwlbdczq).
> >  
> > thanks
>  

I accept, and I will be add these details in RFC.  
>  
> In case my earlier message wasn't clear, I was asking for the RFC itself to 
> be padded out with those sorts of details. The reason being, many (most) 
> people won't be already familiar with the surrounding discussions that have 
> happened previously, or the reasons for the potentially strange-seeming 
> design choices made in this RFC.
Thanks for the suggestion. :)

> > >  
> > >  
> > >  
> > > > Any objections?
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > —
> > > > Best,
> > > > Wei Dai
> > >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> > --
> > Xinchen Hui
> > @Laruence
> > http://www.laruence.com/
>  

—  
Wei Dai


--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to