On 16 March 2015 at 08:04, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > > Some of this Syntactic sugar would in the past have been developed in > PEAR, but the support for 'userland' solutions via that path seems to > have lost favour, with even the suggestion that PEAR should be dropped? > Perhaps if PEAR contained examples of good practice in these areas it > would help. I'd even perhaps go as far as suggesting that some of the > more exotic developments in core would benefit from up to date demo's of > their use in PEAR? >
And how do you propose the lexer/parser is extended in this manner?
