On 15/03/15 21:33, Anthony Ferrara wrote: > However, it has become exceedingly clear to me that this good faith > has not been reciprocated. The understanding that we had when both > proposals opened has now been violated. Rules have been broken and > politics are ensuing in an attempt to sabotage this proposal. Rather > than working together, "unofficial polls", backdoor politics and poor > behavior have created yet more toxicity.
It is clear that while a majority of people may want type hinting in PHP7, just how to achieve that is NOT agreed. Even nudging THIS RFC just over the target vote still leaves many problems. Just how many people are voting for strict mode only? How many for ANY weak mode and how many would accept an alternative weak mode mechanism if strict mode was was a separate option which could be optionally added. Even claiming 'victory' would be a hollow win if what is included is simply ignored by 1/3rd of the users. You obviously desperately want strict mode, and I see no problem with that being an extension on top of a weak mode implementation, but is the bundled weak mode really what others want? Even Zeev want's type hinting just not in the way currently being proposed here, and perhaps a lot of the opposition is to that to the detriment of adding type hinting - if we have to have it. -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
