> Am 09.03.2015 um 12:04 schrieb David Zuelke <d...@heroku.com>:
> 
> Why not wait with the merge until a consensus emerges regarding Throwable?
> 
> 
>> On 09.03.2015, at 05:26, Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi internals!
>>> 
>>> Voting on the engine exceptions RFC, which proposes to convert existing
>>> fatal and recoverable fatal errors into exceptions, has opened:
>>> 
>>>   https://wiki.php.net/rfc/engine_exceptions_for_php7#vote
>>> 
>>> The primary vote requires a 2/3 majority, as this is a language change.
>>> 
>>> A second vote will decide whether to use a BaseException based inheritance
>>> hierarchy. This vote uses a simple majority.
>>> 
>>> Voting is open until 2015-03-08.
>>> 
>> 
>> This RFC has been accepted with 60 votes in favor and 2 against. The
>> BaseException hierarchy has been accepted with 39 in favor and 19 against.
>> 
>> During voting some concerns about the naming of the BaseException class
>> have been raised. This detail can be sorted out in a follow-up discussion -
>> changing this (assuming only the name is changed) is simple and only a
>> couple of tests need to be adjusted.
>> 
>> Dmitry, do you want to merge your current patch?
>> 
>> Nikita

I'd like to merge master in and finish my patches to use the EngineException 
too.

Also, what's the reason to delay it? The RFC only should be a tiny commit to 
rename and change from abstract class to interface. Whose voting will finish 
not before beginning of April...
Nothing significant will be changed (simple find&replace, that's probably all), 
but it's easier to adapt, when the changes are in earlier.

I just can repeat Nikita: Please merge it, Dmitry.

Thanks,
Bob
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to