Hi Rowan,

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 02/03/2015 22:36, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
>
>> I like scalar objects, but it does not resolve that PHP has non standard
>> function names.
>> It does not change old names, therefore it's impossible to resolve issue.
>> This is the reason why I'm proposing while I like scalar object, use of
>> namespace, etc.
>>
>
> Again, you're contradicting yourself here - you can't say that your
> mission is to change the old names, rather than offer an alternative, but
> then also say that the old names will stay around forever. If both names
> exist, that's exactly what you've created - an alternative.
>

I think there is big difference between new API and alias.
Alias is just a copy, new API works differently.


> If we're going to have an alternative, let's come up with a creative
> alternative that actually has an advantage to using it, not a choice
> between equally cryptic names like "strripos" vs "str_ripos".


I don't like the name neither. I improved other names such as
"array_sort_assoc_reverse → arsort" ,
but I kept cryptic libc names.

Suggestions are appreciated for cryptic names.
I think "gettext_d" is equally bad, for example...

Regards,

--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohg...@ohgaki.net

Reply via email to