On 01/03/15 00:37, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote: >> Yes, the global vs local setting issue is distinct from the question of >> > "is phar://blah a URL?" > > I think your question is about remote/local resource. > Is phar:// local resource? It's yes. > Is phar:// URL/URI? I think it depends how people understand URL/URI. > file:// is considered URI/URL even if it's local resource.
A URI consists of two parts ... URL (where/what the resource is) URN (the name of the resource) phar: and file: are URL scheme names and yes there is nothing here to designate if the resource is local or remote. So yes allow_url_include is a totally wrong description anyway? Simply because at the time is was added I don't think local url's were even considered? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
