Hi Padraic, On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Pádraic Brady <padraic.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24 February 2015 at 22:08, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohg...@ohgaki.net> wrote: > > Random bytes is better. People would use it for IV or like with the > > size of IV. If we use string, users loose effective bits. > > Suggestion was for an additional function, so random_bytes() would > still be there ;). random_string() sounds good to me, too! It can be used system generated passwords, etc. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki yohg...@ohgaki.net
