On 02/20/2015 02:23 PM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Markus Fischer <mar...@fischer.name> wrote:
On 20.02.15 18:55, Sara Golemon wrote:
Announcing this in its own thread:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reserve_even_more_types_in_php_7
This RFC acts as an addition to Levi's
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/reserve_more_types_in_php_7 by creating a
forum for voting on additional types not included in his RFC:
resource, object, scalar, mixed, numeric
From the RFC:
“resource”
“object”
“scalar”
“mixed”
“numeric”
"... prohibits their usage as class, interface and trait names."
This is such a major BC break.
One thing we must do before even considering non required names is to
actually check every major apps, frameworks or libraries. If we can
avoid a date/datetime clash again, that would be awesome ;)
"resource" is problematic as that is the proper name for "the thing that
corresponds to a URL" in REST. I would be shocked if there aren't
classes named Resource (namespaced or not) floating around in web
services code. I actually started writing one myself at one point on
the side but got distracted by something else shiny...
--Larry Garfield
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
