On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Joe Watkins <pthre...@pthreads.org> >>> wrote: >>> > Morning internals, >>> > >>> > The expectations RFC is now in voting phase: >>> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/expectations#vote >>> >>> I totally miss the Expectation RFC announcement. Where the RFC was >>> actually proposed for discussions. >>> >>> I have been following up the DbC thread, seeing some mentions but >>> that's it. The RFC itself popped up 3 days ago. >> >> >> It's from 2013 > > Yes, but.... > >> and it was discussed actively during last week. > > Still, no announce for a discussion about this specific RFC. And > really, the content of the RFC is almost empty, pointing to the ML > archive is really not the right way :)
So, back to more useful feedback. I like the concept and idea but still not sure about the custom exception vs AssertException. My gut feeling tells me that it could be better to solve that prior this vote, which actually asks to choose something we did not define yet. It could be in the same RFC (and making it more complete while being at it). -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
