I think __RETURN__ is better than $ret. Dmitry.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Patrick Schaaf <p...@bof.de> wrote: > Am 10.02.2015 09:29 schrieb "Dmitry Stogov" <dmi...@zend.com>: > > > > I cnahged $> into $ret, because $> just won't work. Some better solution > is welcome. > > Also think $> would be awful. Don't like $ret either. What about a magic > constant __RETURN__ or __RESULT__? This would stand out very well when > glancing at the expression, would fit in with naming of other magic > constants, and might even be made to work in finally blocks, where the same > need for access to the returned value exists. > > best regards > Patrick >
