On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 11:14 AM, guilhermebla...@gmail.com <guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > Sorry, but you don't. Proposing a simple syntax is the same as not proposing > it. > We can do whatever syntax is proposed, but we need to discuss on how to > handle inheritance, overriding, etc. > None ever discussed that. 2010's patch handled all that nicely. I do > remember however Dmitry had a suggestion to optimize the overall storage of > annotation values, but it got lost in time. I somehow remember he wanted to > store a cached version of reflection class into the class entry and expose > as Class::CLASS or something... I saw this written in another place too... > it got slightly changed over time and we now have it return only its FQCN.
Benjamin proposed it and I think it is a good compromise, it can then evolve if necessary or desired. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
