Hi, On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 7:58 PM, François Laupretre <franc...@tekwire.net> wrote: >> De : Andrey Andreev [mailto:n...@devilix.net] >> >> I seem to have missed the new parameter (and constants) addition >> during the discussion ... sorry to say this, but that one would >> probably fail the RFC. > > Mmh... I don't like the idea of adding a parameter but several people argued > that we needed a way to control looping behavior, as the original idea was to > loop through the replace array. > > But I am still hesitating. > > Instead of voting on the RFC, please tell me which behavior you prefer : > > - an options argument to decide on the looping behavior, > - always stopping replacements when the replace array is exhausted > - always looping > > The other options are too exotic to become the default behavior. >
Always looping, the other option is already covered by strtr(). I'd like control over the behavior too, but that just makes the API really ugly. Cheers, Andrey. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
