On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2015 9:20 PM, "François Laupretre" <franc...@tekwire.net> wrote: > The whole code to consider as part of an extension, whatever the language, > must be kept in sync. And the best way to achieve this is to store it in a > single file. > > I would rather say in a single release and package. Built in scripts in an > extension is an extremely bad step, maintenance, issues management and all > possible complications to allow that may bring. But we get each other view. > I only hope we will not do that. > > Also interesting to ignore the other questions, which are imho very > critical. :) > How is shipping php code inside so/ddl worse than shipping just the C code this way? I agree with you it makes changing the PHP code more difficult (requires recompile), but it makes the deployment and build much simpler. Including the security concerns. > > Regards, > > > > François > > > > > > > > >
