On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Or maybe be more explicit and use "cstr" for C strings. (For symmetry the >> zend_string type could become zstr.) >> > I personally prefer cstr/zstr for explicitness, but agree that the > main focus should be consistency. > > -Sara > > And yes, the fact that smart_string deals with char* while smart_str > deals with zstring, but smart_str used to be the char* API. That's a > big bucket of clown.
I favor 'zstr' and 'cstr' over something like 'str' and 'string'. Perhaps zend_zstr_ would seem a bit redundant (zend zend string) but better than ambiguity and having to look it up. -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
