On Dec 24, 2014 2:38 PM, "Stanislav Malyshev" <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > But:  return 0 and return FAILURE... which is simpler?
>
> It's equally simple to write, but FAILURE of course is way simpler to
> understand when read.

I totally agree.

I do not care much about the value of failure or success but I am tired to
have to read the code to see if it is 0, 1, or -1 on failure.

The kind of uniformization I would like to see for the php internals APIs.

About the argument for the lack of info in function signature:

A simple typedef will solve it, for the good:

status php_foo();

Or something along this line.

Yes, it will mean yet another large set of changes for ext developers. But
at this point, it may be a good time to do it.

Cheers,
Pierre

Reply via email to