Hi, Not trying to demerit the proposal, but accepting ?-> and black magic just seems wrong, very wrong. You need to write defensive code, not rely on the language to do that for you.
[]s, On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > > First, how is this substantially different from catching an > > exception? With Nikita’s Exceptions in the Engine RFC > > (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/engine_exceptions_for_php7), something like > > this would be possible: > > > > try { return $foo->bar()->qux()->elePHPant()->dance(); } catch > > (EngineException $e) { return NULL; } > > This actually is not a good code. Exceptions should not be used for > something that is expected and normal, they should rather be used for > situations where you code does something you could not predict. > Programming for exceptions is usually bad style, and designing code flow > expecting exceptions is usually bad idea. So I'd actually prefer being > able, like, say, in Groovy, to say "try to call this long chain of > whatever, but if it doesn't work out, just give me null". Of course, it > is not for carefully controlled code with error reporting, but for some > prototype code dealing with dirty data I found such shortcuts be rather > helpful. I'd like PHP to be more Groovy and less Java, in other words ;) > > > Second, not short-circuiting is rather unintuitive. I think most > > people would expect it to short-circuit. Note that ?? and isset() > > short-circuit, so this would be inconsistent with existing > > NULL-checking operators. So why, then, are you proposing that it > > should not short-circuit? Is there some obscure case that this makes > > easier? If anything, I’d expect that short-circuiting is the more > > useful behaviour. For example, take the following hypothetical line > > of code: > > > > $elePHPantParty->danceClub?->addToDanceFloor($elePHPantPool->remove()); > > I agree, for this feature I think it is a must that it would have no > magic like evaluating code way past the first null in ?-> chain. As soon > as there's null on the left of ?->, we should be done and return null, > it should work just like the if would work. In fact, it can even compile > to the same code as if() would. > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalys...@gmail.com > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Guilherme Blanco MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com GTalk: guilhermeblanco Toronto - ON/Canada
