On 09/12/14 14:07, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>> On 9 Dec 2014, at 13:35, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/12/14 13:07, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9 Dec 2014, at 08:15, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If ICU is to be adopted as the base for unicode support, then surely
>>>> everything else should follow those rules?
>>>> \uhhhh and \Uhhhhhhhh are defined along with \x{hhhhhh} so does it make
>>>> sense to add something which is not part of ICU?
>>>
>>> Er, where does ICU define \uXXXX and \UXXXXXX? I don't unferstand.
>>
>> http://userguide.icu-project.org/strings/regexp
>
> We aren't using ICU regular expressions, and ICU is merely an implementation
> detail anyway.
Has THAT been agreed on? Surely if using ICU fully in PHP7 in place of
the patchwork of current fixes for unicode then we don't want to be
breaking thing again by odd differences from the core code for unicode?
I though the agreement was that there was no resource to create an
alternative from scratch?
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
