Hey: On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Dmitry Stogov <dmi...@zend.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on call/return sequence optimization. As part of this work I'm > minimizing the size of call frame (zend_execute_data) and number of > read/write operations on call/return. > > Could you please take a look into the patch that removes EX(scope) > https://gist.github.com/dstogov/5ad50d582346385d587e > > All phpt tests are passed, but I'm not completely sure about one line - > https://gist.github.com/dstogov/5ad50d582346385d587e#file-ex_scope-05-diff-L193 > > On the other hand I can't imagine what it may break. neither do I.
> > Matteo, can you please run your test suites with this patch. > > PS: I'm also going to: > - pack EX(num_args) into reserved space of EX(This) > - try to get rid of EX(frame_info) > - try to merge EX(called_scope) and EX(This). Only one of them matters. > - try to replace zval EX(This) with a pointer to zend_object EX(object) Hmm, EX(This) is not like EX(object), it will be accessed by vm handler: get_obj_zval_ptr_unused it suppores to return a zval * there. if EX(This) became a zend_object *, then we may face different handlers for IS_UNUSED and other types :< thanks > > Thanks. Dmitry. -- Xinchen Hui @Laruence http://www.laruence.com/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
