On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote:
> Hi! > > > > Do we always load the class in the hint? We could perhaps only do it > > for inheritance checks? > > No, classes are not loaded for type checks, since it would be pointless > - if the class is not loaded, you could not have a value of that type, > so if the class is not present, the answer is "no". > It's not true anymore, with this proposal. Thanks. Dmitry. > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ >
