On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:41:38AM +0200, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
> Am 24.10.2014 01:36 schrieb "Andrea Faulds" <a...@ajf.me>:
> >
> > Here’s another RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties
>
> +1 for the general feature, I'd love to have that available.
>
> I have an idea regarding the additional keyword, with a small implication
> (improvement) to the functionality provided, but at the cost of being
> slightly quirky :) The idea is:
>
> public $foo as private;
> public $bar as protected;
> protected $baz as private;
>
> where the "as X" gives the writability scope. This introduces no new
> keywords, and is currently not valid syntax, as far as I can see.
More as musing than anything else - might provide some insight via an analogy.
Properties and methods have a scope that is: private, protected or public.
This reminds me of the Unix: owner, group & other file permissions.
Unix allows: read, write & execute.
This RFC is trying to control how a property could be used with a readonly
restriction.
Are there times when one would want to be able to set a property value - but not
read it ?
Thinking about execute - would there be any mileage in an execute permission -
could be useful for a property that had been assigned an anonymous function.
Finally we could bring it all together and sidestep the scoping keywords using
'var' instead. Thus:
var $callback as 0751;
Would define a property that contains an anonymous function that could be called
by anyone, inspected by the class & related class, but only set by the class
itself!
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT
Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information:
http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
