On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 08:40 +0100, Leigh wrote:
> On 21 October 2014 08:06, Joe Watkins <pthre...@pthreads.org> wrote:
> > Morning internalz,
> >
> >         https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ustring
> >
> >         This is the result of work done by a few of us, we won't be opening 
> > any
> > vote in a fortnight. We have a long time before 7, there is no rush
> > whatever.
> >
> >         Now seems like a good time to start the conversation so we can hash 
> > out
> > the details, or get on with other things ;)
> >
> 
> Breaks nothing, faster than mbstring, seems like win/win to me.
> 
> > On the flip side, implementing UString as a scalar object would be 
> > inconsistent. At time of writing, array, int, float, bool, etc have no 
> > implementation available for this.
> 
> I agree it shouldn't be a scalar object, but how about some operator
> overloading like the GMP object has, so that you don't have to cast to
> string for expected behaviour with type coercion etc.
> 
> > Right now there are user-space libraries out there that cover a lot more 
> > functionality than UString.
> 
> Do you need help implementing these? Do you think it would be
> beneficial to briefly list which areas need attention on the RFC, so
> they can be checked off over time?
> 
> Overall +1 on the concept.

Morning Leigh,

ZEND_CONCAT is overloaded, as well as read_dimension and cast (to
string) handlers. This seems to cover everything, unless I missed
something ?

Cheers
Joe


-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to