Hi!

> My point is that providing them as "userland implementation" even inside
> core would be more interesting than having something magic going on
> under the hood.

It certainly may be "interesting", and nobody prevents you from writing
a blog or implementing a library doing this. However, it is not the
reason to change the core functions of PHP.

> Yes, I realize that complete removal would completely kill PHP's
> adoption for the next version, so I'm thinking about something like an
> ini setting:
> 
> "zeh_legacy_includeh = '/zeh/path/to/old/functions.php';"

You're trying to solve a problem that did not exist before you tried to
solve it.

> Yet this would allow removing a lot of internal functions that were
> written just for the sake of it, and move them to something that can be
> maintained by a larger userbase.

These functions weren't written "just for the sake of it". They were
written because people needed it.

-- 
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to