On 11/10/14 00:28, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > On 10 Oct 2014, at 23:20, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > >> Is this the right approach to implement BIGINT? >> I don't see the use of GMP to implement something as simple as native 64 >> bit numbers on 64 bit platforms as the right base. > > Um, we already have this since the 64-bit patch. > >> All we are missing is >> correctly handling two word data on a 32bit platform. The wrapping and >> everything still applies, but only on a 32 bit platform ... no need for >> the complication of GMP. The bit I'm looking at here IS using BIGINT as >> array keys without the problems of them changing to long strings and I >> don't see how GMP fixes that? > > What you want is 64-bit data handling. This is arbitrary-bit data handling. > It’s not a “wrong approach”.
So BIGINT on 32 bit platforms will be different to BIGINT on 64 bit platforms? BIGINT is a fix length number not a variable one ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
