Write an extension for it then, also share your benchmarks :) On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Park Framework <park.framew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Performance testing, Msgpack VS Igbinary > > igbinary: -20% slower, data size ~5% > > Advantage Msgpack, he works fast, and this format understood by many > technologies - Java, Python, Lua in Redis. > > > 2014-09-23 12:20 GMT+03:00 Paul Dragoonis <dragoo...@gmail.com>: > > Hi <person hiding behind a project>, > > > > Backwards compatibility is one hurdle, but if you wipe all your > serialised > > data then begin to re-serialise using the new approach then you're fine. > > > > As for what to use msgpack or igbinary, well there's already good support > > for igbinary in PHP thanks to Pierre and others. You should benchmark > > igbinary vs msgpack and come back with your findings if we're to evaluate > > alternative serialization libraries. > > > > Many thanks, > > Paul > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Park Framework < > park.framew...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> PHP serialization is slowest in PHP Session, clients NoSQL, ... > >> I would like to have in PHP 7, a new serialization algorithm or custom > >> handler to serialize. > >> > >> My opinion is that the best choice is to use msgpack, it is > >> +110% faster > >> -30% data size > >> > >> HHVM discussed this issue, but all boils down to backward compatibility > >> with PHP > >> https://github.com/facebook/hhvm/issues/2654 > >> > >> What do you think about this, maybe it's time to change the old > >> algorithm serialization, on something better? > >> > >> -- > >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >> > > >
