On Sep 22, 2014 3:29 PM, "Derick Rethans" <der...@php.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Sep 2014, Andrey Andreev wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > > > > > On 22 Sep 2014, at 12:32, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net> wrote: > > > > > >> On Sat, 20 Sep 2014, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > >> > > >>> Perhaps I’m being unfair and overthinking things, but I wonder if > > >>> it is really fair for people who have no karma, i.e. not > > >>> contributors to the documentation, extensions, php-src or anything > > >>> else, to have the ability to vote on RFCs? > > >>> > > >>> I’d never suggest people without internals karma can’t vote. I > > >>> think doc and peck contributors are as valued as any other > > >>> contributors. However, people with no karma whatsoever (a blank > > >>> people.php.net page) voting irks me. > > >> > > >> I think people's votes should only count if they have karma to the > > >> section of the code that the RFC/feature/whatever relates to. > > > > > > Is that really fair? If we break BC, plenty of userland developers > > > might be affected and they should have a right to chime in. > > > > That would be quite unfair, not just because of BC breaks and/or > > userland developers' votes (there aren't many, afaik). > > Practically every language change would be decided by only a handful > > of people, while it should be important that many votes are gathered > > for important decisions. > > There is a big difference between votes, and voices. Voices should > definitely be listened too.
We agree on listening. Only not on how we listen. > Derick > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
