On Monday, 22 September 2014, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > On 21 Sep 2014, at 22:49, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > It is closed now. > > > > The vote is closed now, fact. That does not prevent further (hopefully > productive) discussion from happening, and it also doesn’t stipulate that > the RFC must be merged. > > The RFC is merged. I suppose you could revert the changes, though it’d be > a significant hassle.
Immediately reverting a change is a knee-jerk reaction that should not take place. That said, this vote was closed early, whether deliberately or not, and merged, which goes against everything we've been aiming for with the RFC process. > > > Closing the vote at the most convenient opportunity, when it suits the > author most, is not cool. > > I didn’t close it because the time suited me most. I made an honest > mistake and closed it 22 or so hours early because I forgot I’d opened the > vote at ~23:00 and not ~02:00. Unfortunately, I realised my mistake after > merging the patch. This was definitely not intentional. If you say so. Still, the asking of individuals to remove their votes so that the tally is in you favour is inexcusable. > -- > Andrea Faulds > http://ajf.me/ > > > > >
