On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Leigh <lei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20 September 2014 20:47, Sara Golemon <p...@golemon.com> wrote:
>> I like the general idea, but rather than explicitly focusing on the 'or'
>> keyword, how about just giving all loop constructs (do/while/for/foreach) a
>> return value? I'd suggest an integer return value indicating the number of
>> times the loop executed.
>>
>
> mind === blown
>
> This would open up a huge amount of other functionality I'd never
> dreamed of (some of which is quite scary!)
>
> for($i = for(...) {}; $i < ...) {}
>
Yikes, I truly hope nobody ever writes that code. Ever.
> I'm really not sure I understand the full implication of this though.
> This would mean changing loop constructs from statements to
> expressions. I wonder how difficult that will actually be, and what
> other problems it would cause (I obviously haven't played with this
> idea yet).
>
I admit, I haven't thought it through entirely either. Nor even if
it's definitely possible.
> It would also mean having to make { default block } into an
> expression... with a return value (to be allowed on either side of the
> boolean or)
>
Excellent point, a block only works with T_OR if it has a value. I'm
pretty sure that at this point, it doesn't. That does put a monkey
wrench into it. Perhaps a lambda could accommodate that? Starts to
get ugly though...
> Lots to think about here, if it's at all viable this will need it's
> own separate RFC, it's a much more invasive change, but definitely a
> great idea.
>
Yeah, I might be trying too hard. Worth exploring a tiny bit though...
-Sara
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
