On 20 September 2014 15:37, Johannes Schlüter <johan...@schlueters.de> wrote:
>
> It is unclear what a "no" means. Might be a related to the patch the
> design, a misunderstanding or due to a critical issue ...  in the end a
> vote creates "losers" with little feedback.
>
> But well, I'm saying this from day one of the voting.
>
> johannes
>

This is my opinion exactly

Some people who vote no are involved in the internals discussion, and
that's great. But some people vote no without a word. How do we know
they even understand the impact of their vote? Without their feedback
how can the proposal be improved?

Even if they say "I'm voting no because of all of the reasons stated
by Person X", that's enough to know that more than one person doesn't
like a specific aspect, and makes it a higher priority for
improvement.

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to