On 18 September 2014 22:19:46 GMT+01:00, Rowan Collins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> wrote: > >I hope this message doesn't sound too negative, and look forward to >clarification of your thoughts. > >
Apologies, I've just realised that that message wasn't in fact the beginning of the thread, so some of my comments are way off base. Out of context, it looked like a bit of a rant about how ANY could never be a useful option. Still, the only line that really addressed the question was this: > I don't think there's anything askew in MX being the default for checkdnsrr() if you think of it as a cut-down generalization of checkdmsmx() (Sorry, that's not a direct quote because I'm having copy and paste issues.) Sorry again for the misunderstanding. -- Rowan
