On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Paul Dragoonis <dragoo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Andi Gutmans <a...@zend.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nikita,
>>
>> I reviewed the AST RFC on my way to vote but there was something that
>> wasn’t clear to me.
>> This patch introduces some semantic/behavioral changes in addition to the
>> AST.
>> Are these as a side-effect of how AST was implemented? Or are they
>> unrelated to the AST patch?
>> I think some of them make sense but I’m having a bit of a hard time
>> separating out the benefits of the AST (which I really like) and making
>> other changes to semantics w/o really understanding if they are
>> side-effects and we have no choice vs. we’re trying to solve for two
>> separate items in one RFC.
>> Any BC breaks here we think could bite us?
>>
>
> Hi Nikita,
>
> I second some of Andi's concerns about behavioural changes, some things
> working from right-to-left and not left-to-right. Are these things that we
> can adapt the AST part or tweak another part to make this more consistent
> with previous versions of PHP.
I just had a chat with Paul about this, and there was a
misunderstanding about what this RFC actually does regarding
left-to-right evaluation on list() constructs. I also saw this
misunderstanding in a few other places, so it seems to be a common
misunderstanding.
Under the proposed changes as well as in PHP 5.x, the end result of
the following is the same:
list($a, $b) = array(1, 2);
$a will be 1 and $b will be 2. Again, this hasn't changed. The
difference is that in PHP 5.x the variable $b will be assigned 2
before $a is assigned 1; under these changes $a will be assigned 1
first and then $b will be assigned 2.
This really only affects strange situations, such as ones listed in the RFC.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
