On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Tjerk Meesters <tjerk.meest...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Johannes Schlüter <
> johan...@schlueters.de> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 23:09 +0800, Tjerk Meesters wrote:
>> > > On 18 Aug, 2014, at 10:47 pm, Johannes Schlüter <
>> johan...@schlueters.de> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> On Mon, 2014-08-18 at 14:44 +0200, Marc Bennewitz wrote:
>> > >> The question isn't "What's wrong with ===, strcmp()?" but "What's
>> wrong
>> > >> with ==, <, >?".
>> > >>
>> > >> We have a standard way to compare two operands but currently we do
>> some
>> > >> magic things to solve something that don't need to be solved.
>> > >
>> > > Still it is a key property of the language which we can't simply
>> change.
>> > > Also mind this: All input data are strings and some databases also
>> > > return data as string. So code like
>> > >
>> > > if ($_GET['id'] > 0)
>> > > or
>> > > if ($db->fetchRow()[0] == 12)
>> > >
>> > > which is common will break.
>> >
>> > Those two cases will actually not be affected, it's strictly
>> string<=>string comparisons that's being discussed here.
>>
>> Meaning that simple code you find everywhere, in every second tutorial
>>
>> foreach ($db->query("SELECT id, title FROM entries") as $row) {
>> echo "<tr><td";
>> if ($row[0] == $_GET['highlight_id']) {
>> echo " background='#ff0000'";
>> }
>> echo ">".htmlentities($row[1])."</td></tr>";
>> }
>>
>> will suddenly fail. How wonderful! (irony)
>>
>
> Not necessarily and certainly not by definition; reasons for failure are
> less obvious such as (but not limited to):
>
> "0" == "0.0"
> "11" == " 11" (but note that "11" == "11 " currently yields false)
> "0" == ""
>
I had mistakenly assumed that "0" == "" would currently yield true, but it
doesn't. My apologies for that. The other two statements are still valid,
though. So are these:
"0" == "0x0"
"0" == "00"
> I'm not arguing for or against this behaviour change, but I found it
> necessary to clear up some apparent confusion as to what repercussions this
> proposal carries.
>
> Another approach of attempting to solve the common issue of comparing big
> numbers with '==' is to only enforce string-wise comparison if a number
> cast would cause precision loss.
>
>
>> johannes
>>
>> ps. yes, the example might be done nicer and better, it still represents
>> a common pattern.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> --
> Tjerk
>
--
--
Tjerk
