On 19 August 2014 11:24, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jan Ehrhardt <php...@ehrhardt.nl> wrote: > > Is pecl_http v2 still dependent on propro and raphf? If so, they should > > be in core as well. > > > > I never really understood why they are needed or why they have been > splitted off. I can imagine that other exts may need a similar thing > but... >
To be reusable. pecl/raphf is also used by pecl/pq; peck/propro has not had another use case yet, though. -- Regards, Mike
