Hi Nikita, I reviewed the AST RFC on my way to vote but there was something that wasn’t clear to me. This patch introduces some semantic/behavioral changes in addition to the AST. Are these as a side-effect of how AST was implemented? Or are they unrelated to the AST patch? I think some of them make sense but I’m having a bit of a hard time separating out the benefits of the AST (which I really like) and making other changes to semantics w/o really understanding if they are side-effects and we have no choice vs. we’re trying to solve for two separate items in one RFC. Any BC breaks here we think could bite us?
Any insight would be much appreciated. Thanks! Andi On Aug 18, 2014, at 9:41 AM, Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi internals! > > I've opened the vote on the Abstract Syntax Tree RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abstract_syntax_tree#vote > > Thanks, > Nikita -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
