On 18 Aug 2014, at 00:40, Levi Morrison <le...@php.net> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalys...@sugarcrm.com> wrote: >> Hi! >> >>> It does, but maybe you missed it. Under the Proposal section: >>> >>>> To solve this, we relax the current invariant of scoped closures >>>> having to be bound, and add a new parameter to bind(To) to produce >>>> an unbound, scoped closure, like so: >> >> Indeed, I missed it - I was looking for bindTo. I think it should be >> made more prominent, and I'm not sure what closure that is not static, >> but does not have a bound object, means. What happens if you call it? It >> sounds a bit strange concept - why would you need a closure that is not >> static, but is not bound to any object? > > Hence the vote was cancelled while it is reworked.
To clarify: The RFC has been reworked now, I actually changed the RFC and patch just before I cancelled the vote. Review appreciated before vote is reopened. -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
