On Jul 20, 2014 11:13 PM, "Derick Rethans" <der...@php.net> wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Jul 2014, Andrea Faulds wrote: > > > > > On 20 Jul 2014, at 00:26, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > > > > The poll is now open: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/php6#vote > > > > > > Voting shall end in a week’s time on 2014-07-27. > > > > I’ve cancelled the vote because I don’t think the case for 6 is > > sufficiently fleshed out. The RFC is now massively imbalanced in > > favour of 7, which isn’t really fair to the 6 side, and I don’t think > > we can hold a vote while that’s still the case. > > > > Unfortunately I’m not terribly good at making such a case, so help in > > developing the 6 side would be appreciated. I won’t reopen the vote > > until the 6 side is sufficiently developed. > > Huh what? This is like you weren't happy with the way how the vote was > going so you cancelled it? What nonsense.
Please get the facts straight before commenting. I am astonishes to see so much energy spent on a such non critical topic. >From people who should really spend more time actually discussing what will be php next (which should be much more more than just perf improvement). This is disappointing. Even more to see the RFC process being tricked out again.
