On 20 Jul 2014, at 16:39, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It might be just me, but the whole RFC actually seems particularly > one-sided. The argument for PHP 6 is very short and reads half-baked. The > overwhelming majority of this very short section of the RFC is spent > describing how naming the release “PHP 6” will be a problem, with a very > wishy-washy conclusion that the author “expects” and “thinks” it won’t end > up being a problem. The PHP 6 section makes no attempt to provide counter > points to things mentioned in the following section, nor really attempts to > make *any* strong point at all. I swear the PHP 6 section was much longer before. Did Zeev delete some of it? -- Andrea Faulds http://ajf.me/ -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
