On Jul 16, 2014 4:29 PM, "Zeev Suraski" <z...@zend.com> wrote:
> For me the introduction of a new set of rules is a deal breaker. > I'm -1 on the RFC the way it is, and +1 if we implement these 'hints' as > implicit casts, plus change implicit casts to emit E_CAST in case of loss > of data or 'bogus' conversions. I am -1 in yet another error (as in E_*), which will be just as painful to deal with than any other.
