On 06/07/14 12:21, Andrea Faulds wrote: > The RFC has been updated. I’ve backed down and made the vote be 50%+1 with > the options PHP 6 and PHP 7. Hence only a plurality of votes is needed to win. > > Hopefully this should be decisive, unless the number of Yes and No votes > matches.
Andrea - Your total disregard for anything other then a a single reason related to books is a problem here. While printed /electronic books are a part of the problem with the tag PHP6, there are considerable additional references to that tag over the last 10+ years, along with a substantial amount of code in the code base which was a dead end. PHP6 has been linked with development work which will not now be taken forward. To some extent WHAT the next version is released as is perhaps not the problem here, but rather being able to simply identify third party discussions relating to the current roadmap(s) for PHPNext? It's just the matter of ring fencing what is the current roadmap and plan for PHPNext and isolating that from the older existing PHP6 documented plans ... The use of PHP7 can be simply explained, fits in perfectly with the code base, and provides a clean tag to move forward? Using some alternative tag until a release is ready and then switching back to PHP6 simply does not make sense? -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
