On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi, > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Christopher Jones > <christopher.jo...@oracle.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 10/23/2013 05:36 AM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm proposing two simple patches that eliminate a lot of useless zval > >> copying. > >> For example they remove only about 800 calls to zend_hash_copy() (25%) > on > >> each request to wordpress-3.6.0 home page and make it 2-4% faster. > >> > >> It's not a questions about master branch, but I think it is also safe to > >> commit them into PHP-5.4 and PHP-5.5. > >> > >> Any objections? > >> > >> https://gist.github.com/dstogov/7117623 > >> > >> https://gist.github.com/dstogov/7117649 > >> > >> Thanks. Dmitry. > >> > > > > I'd prefer PHP 5.4 was kept stable. > > > > Last time I suggested keeping PHP 5.4 stable [1], it wasn't, and the > result > > was > > a performance regression [2]. > > I tend to agree with Chris here, even for 5.5 :) > I don't care a lot about 5.4, but think it should be fixed in 5.5. > > > However, Let me ask Matt to run our full tests suite against your > patch, that may give us some numbers to discuss or confirm the safety > of this patch. > Of course we checked patch with PHPT tests and some real-life apps, but in case you have any other test suites it would be a great help to run them too. I would also look into strtr() implementation that became 6 times slower on typical usage in comparison to 5.3 after its "improvement" :( <?php function foo() { for ($i = 0; $i < 100000; $i++) { strtr("abcdefgh", array("a"=>"11", "g"=>"22")); } } foo(); ?> Thanks. Dmitry. > > Matt? Can you run pftt, apps compat and perf tests using this patch pls? > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org >
