2013/9/27 Gordon Oheim <g...@php.net>
>
> Independent but related to
>
> -
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**constructor-promotion<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constructor-promotion>
>
> I wrote an RFC about porting Dart-like Automatic Property Initialization
> to PHP. Nikic was so generous to provide an initial PoC for it (since I
> don't do C):
>
> -
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/**automatic_property_**initialization<https://wiki.php.net/rfc/automatic_property_initialization>
> -
> https://github.com/php/php-**src/pull/474<https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/474>
>
> I am proposing this for inclusion in 5.6.
> There is no BC breaks afaik.
>
> The RFC suggests to allow for $this->foo as Constructor arguments to make
> the boilerplate code for property assignments in constructors superfluous.
> This is the core feature subject to discussion.
>
I simply don't like it to have a concrete method without body. Either
abstract without body, or concrete _with_ body. In this case it would mean
to have an empty body
public function __construct ($this->x) {}
but I think that wouldn't be too bad :)
>
> I've spoken to about two dozen developers outside internals prior to
> suggesting this RFC and the general response was positive and the core
> feature unanimously deemed useful. Moreover, in the previous discussion
> about constructor promotion there was some messages suggesting that the now
> proposed syntactic approach is more preferred than using visibility
> keywords.
>
> The RFC also suggests some related syntactic sugar like Methodless
> Constructors, an alternate and shorter syntax, as well as making this
> available in the entire class scope. These are things I am not sure of so I
> am hoping for comments on these. Should this RFC get into the voting phase,
> we should by then have either promoted or eliminated these options through
> discussion.
>
> Thanks and Regards, Gordon
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
github.com/KingCrunch
