On 27 September 2013 09:55, Nicolas Grekas <nicolas.grekas+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you need access to the methods in AProxifier then why does the anonymous
>> class extend A, you should extend AProxifier as you would with any other
>> class.
>>
>
> Because A has the behavior I want to extend?
>
> An other example:
>
> class A {...}
> class B {...}
>
> class Factory
> {
> protected function protectedMethod() {...}
>
> function getA()
> {
> return new class extends A {.. call Factory::protectedMethod()? ..};
> }
>
> function getB()
> {
> return new class extends B {.. call Factory::protectedMethod()? ..};
> }
> }
>
> This is possible and welcomed with closures.
> I see it as useful for anonymous classes than it is for anonymous functions.
> What do others you think about it?
-1
Just because a closure is an anonymous function does not mean that an
anonymous class has closure capabilites.
--
Regards,
Mike
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
